San Diego’s New Tenant Protections Hurt Landlords and Stifle Development, Discouraging Affordable Housing

The recent approval of new tenant protections in San Diego County has been met with controversy, with many arguing that the ordinances will do more harm than good. The protections include requiring landlords to provide tenants with two to three months of rent as relocation assistance in the event of eviction, as well as increased transparency in the eviction process. While these protections may seem like a step in the right direction for tenants, they come at a cost to landlords and the development of affordable housing.

Landlords are already struggling to keep up with rising costs of property taxes, insurance, and maintenance. The added burden of providing relocation assistance to tenants may discourage landlords from making much-needed improvements to their properties. Additionally, landlords may be less inclined to offer clean and affordable housing if they know they will be on the hook for relocation assistance if a tenant is evicted for reasons beyond their control.

This lack of incentive for landlords could further exacerbate the city’s affordable housing crisis. Without private landlords investing in and improving their properties, there will be fewer housing options for low-income residents, leading to increased homelessness.

Furthermore, the ordinance places the responsibility of providing housing for the homeless on landlords, rather than on the government. While homelessness is a critical issue that requires attention and action, forcing landlords to cover the cost of housing is not a sustainable solution. It may lead to a reduction in the number of rental properties available in the long run, as landlords are disincentivized from participating in the rental market.

While the San Diego City Council’s new tenant protections may seem like a victory for Democrats, they could ultimately do more harm than good. By placing the burden of housing the homeless on landlords and reducing incentives for private landlords to invest in their properties, the city risks exacerbating its affordable housing crisis. It is important for voters to consider the broader implications of these ordinances and push for more sustainable solutions that benefit both tenants and landlords.

Image Credit: Canva